Resolução da Assembleia da República n.º 108/2015 - Diário da República n.º 152/2015, Série I de 2015-08-06
ASSEMBLEIA DA REPÚBLICA Resolução da Assembleia da República n.º 108/2015 Aprova o Acordo Relativo ao Tribunal Unificado de Patentes, assinado em Bruxelas em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 A Assembleia da República resolve, nos termos da alí- nea
-
do artigo 161.º e do n.º 5 do artigo 166.º da Consti- tuição, aprovar o Acordo Relativo ao Tribunal Unificado de Patentes, assinado em Bruxelas em 19 de fevereiro de 2013, cujo texto, na versão autenticada na língua inglesa e respetiva tradução para a língua portuguesa, se publica em anexo.
Aprovada em 10 de abril de 2015. A Presidente da Assembleia da República, Maria da Assunção A. Esteves.
AGREEMENT ON A UNIFIED PATENT COURT The Contracting Member States: Considering that cooperation amongst the Member States of the European Union in the field of patents contrib- utes significantly to the integration process in Europe, in particular to the establishment of an internal market within the European Union characterised by the free movement of goods and services and the creation of a system ensuring that competition in the internal market is not distorted; Considering that the fragmented market for patents and the significant variations between national court systems are detrimental for innovation, in particular for small and medium sized enterprises which have difficulties to enforce their patents and to defend themselves against unfounded claims and claims relating to patents which should be revoked; Considering that the European Patent Convention («EPC») which has been ratified by all Member States of the European Union provides for a single procedure for granting European patents by the European Patent Office; Considering that by virtue of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 ( 1 ), patent proprietors can request unitary effect of their European patents so as to obtain unitary patent protection in the Member States of the European Union participating in the enhanced cooperation; Wishing to improve the enforcement of patents and the defence against unfounded claims and patents which should be revoked and to enhance legal certainty by set- ting up a Unified Patent Court for litigation relating to the infringement and validity of patents; Considering that the Unified Patent Court should be devised to ensure expeditious and high quality decisions, striking a fair balance between the interests of right hold- ers and other parties and taking into account the need for proportionality and flexibility; Considering that the Unified Patent Court should be a court common to the Contracting Member States and thus part of their judicial system, with exclusive competence in respect of European patents with unitary effect and European patents granted under the provisions of the EPC; Considering that the Court of Justice of the European Union is to ensure the uniformity of the Union legal order and the primacy of European Union law; Recalling the obligations of the Contracting Member States under the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), including the obligation of sincere cooperation as set out in Article 4(3) TEU and the obligation to ensure through the Unified Patent Court the full application of, and respect for, Union law in their respective territories and the judicial protection of an individual’s rights under that law; Considering that, as any national court, the Unified Patent Court must respect and apply Union law and, in collaboration with the Court of Justice of the European Union as guardian of Union law, ensure its correct applica- tion and uniform interpretation; the Unified Patent Court must in particular cooperate with the Court of Justice of the European Union in properly interpreting Union law by relying on the latter’s case law and by requesting prelimi- nary rulings in accordance with Article 267 TFEU; Considering that the Contracting Member States should, in line with the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on non-contractual liability, be liable for damages caused by infringements of Union law by the Unified Patent Court, including the failure to request preliminary rulings from the Court of Justice of the Eu- ropean Union; Considering that infringements of Union law by the Unified Patent Court, including the failure to request pre- liminary rulings from the Court of Justice of the European Union, are directly attributable to the Contracting Mem- ber States and infringement proceedings can therefore be brought under Article 258, 259 and 260 TFEU against any Contracting Member State to ensure the respect of the primacy and proper application of Union law; Recalling the primacy of Union law, which includes the TEU, the TFEU, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the general principles of Union law as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, and in particular the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal and a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal, the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and secondary Union law; Considering that this Agreement should be open to ac- cession by any Member State of the European Union; Member States which have decided not to participate in the enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection may participate in this Agreement in respect of European patents granted for their respective territory; Considering that this Agreement should enter into force on 1 January 2014 or on the first day of the fourth month after the 13th deposit, provided that the Contracting Mem- ber States that will have deposited their instruments of ratification or accession include the three States in which the highest number of European patents was in force in the year preceding the year in which the signature of the Agreement takes place, or on the first day of the fourth month after the date of entry into force of the amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 ( 2 ) concerning its rela- tionship with this Agreement, whichever is the latest: have agreed as follows: PART I General and institutional provisions CHAPTER I General provisions Article 1 Unified Patent Court A Unified Patent Court for the settlement of disputes relating to European patents and European patents with unitary effect is hereby established.
The Unified Patent Court shall be a court common to the Contracting Member States and thus subject to the same obligations under Union law as any national court of the Contracting Member States.
Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of this Agreement: (a) «Court» means the Unified Patent Court created by this Agreement; (b) «Member State» means a Member State of the Eu- ropean Union; (c) «Contracting Member State» means a Member State party to this Agreement; (d) «EPC» means the Convention on the Grant of Euro- pean Patents of 5 October 1973, including any subsequent amendments; (e) «European patent» means a patent granted under the provisions of the EPC, which does not benefit from unitary effect by virtue of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012; (f) «European patent with unitary effect» means a patent granted under the provisions of the EPC which benefits from unitary effect by virtue of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012; (g) «Patent» means a European patent and/or a European patent with unitary effect; (h) «Supplementary protection certificate» means a supplementary protection certificate granted under Regu- lation (EC) No 469/2009 ( 3 ) or under Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 ( 4 ); (i) «Statute» means the Statute of the Court as set out in Annex I, which shall be an integral part of this Agree- ment; (j) «Rules of Procedure» means the Rules of Procedure of the Court, as established in accordance with article 41. Article 3 Scope of application This Agreement shall apply to any: (a) European patent with unitary effect; (b) Supplementary protection certificate issued for a product protected by a patent; (c) European patent which has not yet lapsed at the date of entry into force of this Agreement or was granted after that date, without prejudice to article 83; and (d) European patent application which is pending at the date of entry into force of this Agreement or which is filed after that date, without prejudice to article 83. Article 4 Legal status 1 — The Court shall have legal personality in each Con- tracting Member State and shall enjoy the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal persons under the national law of that State. 2 — The Court shall be represented by the President of the Court of Appeal who shall be elected in accordance with the Statute.
Article 5 Liability 1 — The contractual liability of the Court shall be gov- erned by the law applicable to the contract in question in ac- cordance with Regulation (EC) No. 593/2008 ( 5 ) (Rome I), where applicable, or failing that in accordance with the law of the Member State of the court seized. 2 — The non-contractual liability of the Court in respect of any damage caused by it or its staff in the performance of their duties, to the extent that it is not a civil and com- mercial matter within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No. 864/2007 ( 6 ) (Rome II), shall be governed by the law of the Contracting Member State in which the damage occurred.
This provision is without prejudice to the ap- plication of Article 22. 3 — The court with jurisdiction to settle disputes under paragraph 2 shall be a court of the Contracting Member State in which the damage occurred.
CHAPTER II Institutional provisions Article 6 The Court 1 — The Court shall comprise a Court of First Instance, a Court of Appeal and a Registry. 2 — The Court shall perform the functions assigned to it by this Agreement.
Article 7 The Court of First Instance 1 — The Court of First Instance shall comprise a central division as well as local and regional divisions. 2 — The central division shall have its seat in Paris, with sections in...
Para continuar a ler
PEÇA SUA AVALIAÇÃO